<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senator wants to sweeten home buyer tax credit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/</link>
	<description>Money Magazine looks at a wide range of personal finance issues and asks for your feedback.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 00:19:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve, Bremerton, WA</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-21549</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve, Bremerton, WA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-21549</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s unfair to call us greedy for wanting this credit to be extended another year and to include all home buyers.

Some say they did it the right way and without a tax credit X amount of years ago.  Well, so did we.  And we stayed out of debt.  Kept our home.  Now our home is worth $40,000 less on the market.

We need to sell our home due to hell problems I am having.  I can&#039;t handle the stairs anymore.  Although we stayed out of debt and are doing ok today, we weren&#039;t able to save while raising 4 children.  Part of our American Dream was that our house would appreciate in value so when we sold we would have a good down payment on our next home.  Not true anymore.

Now people are having to lower their prices down to the rates of the short sale houses or sold as is houses to get them sold.  Often the sellers are losing money after investing money to fix up those homes to sell them.

First time buyers averagely are able to get a loan of what? around $225k - $235k - often less.  This is causing first time buyers to buy homes in pretty bad shape.  What happens when things start breaking down?  First time buying ate up all their savings?  Do we want them to end up so badly in debt they end up losing their homes causing further crisis?  The tax credit is helping some of these issues from happening.

Now we need to extend it to all home buyers to be fair.  They paid taxes too.  

To the person who said they could use a million and sell their house to their brother etc and then back - think again - you can only get one credit.  Spend more time thinking and less time living in ignorance.

Why should all home buyers get the credit?  Think about it.  We are drastically bringing down the value of homes the way the tax credit exists.  Those wanting to sell their homes or to even refinance are losing options because now their homes aren&#039;t worth squat due to the short sales and those lowering their prices to sell to the first time buyers.  Those who have had a home and held a home for years deserve a break too.  If we sell we will lose a large amount of money on our homes.  Yet we have proven we can keep a home without debt.  Without losing our homes.  Why wouldn&#039;t we want to promote sales to them and increase home sales further up in market value?

At present if I sell my home at a price someone will buy it I will lose money on the deal and not have a down payment.  If I don&#039;t sell my house I will suffer in pain traveling up and down the stairs.

We&#039;re not beggars asking for hand outs.  We are people who lived the American Dream.  Bought our first home.  Expected it to be a step up in the right direction.  Why should just the first time buyers get incentives?  We need to increase and expand home sales.  And we are not greedy to ask that some of our tax money get used for some good to help people.  We give tax money constantly - why shouldn&#039;t some of it be given back in bad times?

There was a time when there wasn&#039;t any tax in America.  We gave when it was needed.  Let America help us now in our time of need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#039;s unfair to call us greedy for wanting this credit to be extended another year and to include all home buyers.</p>
<p>Some say they did it the right way and without a tax credit X amount of years ago.  Well, so did we.  And we stayed out of debt.  Kept our home.  Now our home is worth $40,000 less on the market.</p>
<p>We need to sell our home due to hell problems I am having.  I can&#039;t handle the stairs anymore.  Although we stayed out of debt and are doing ok today, we weren&#039;t able to save while raising 4 children.  Part of our American Dream was that our house would appreciate in value so when we sold we would have a good down payment on our next home.  Not true anymore.</p>
<p>Now people are having to lower their prices down to the rates of the short sale houses or sold as is houses to get them sold.  Often the sellers are losing money after investing money to fix up those homes to sell them.</p>
<p>First time buyers averagely are able to get a loan of what? around $225k &#8211; $235k &#8211; often less.  This is causing first time buyers to buy homes in pretty bad shape.  What happens when things start breaking down?  First time buying ate up all their savings?  Do we want them to end up so badly in debt they end up losing their homes causing further crisis?  The tax credit is helping some of these issues from happening.</p>
<p>Now we need to extend it to all home buyers to be fair.  They paid taxes too.  </p>
<p>To the person who said they could use a million and sell their house to their brother etc and then back &#8211; think again &#8211; you can only get one credit.  Spend more time thinking and less time living in ignorance.</p>
<p>Why should all home buyers get the credit?  Think about it.  We are drastically bringing down the value of homes the way the tax credit exists.  Those wanting to sell their homes or to even refinance are losing options because now their homes aren&#039;t worth squat due to the short sales and those lowering their prices to sell to the first time buyers.  Those who have had a home and held a home for years deserve a break too.  If we sell we will lose a large amount of money on our homes.  Yet we have proven we can keep a home without debt.  Without losing our homes.  Why wouldn&#039;t we want to promote sales to them and increase home sales further up in market value?</p>
<p>At present if I sell my home at a price someone will buy it I will lose money on the deal and not have a down payment.  If I don&#039;t sell my house I will suffer in pain traveling up and down the stairs.</p>
<p>We&#039;re not beggars asking for hand outs.  We are people who lived the American Dream.  Bought our first home.  Expected it to be a step up in the right direction.  Why should just the first time buyers get incentives?  We need to increase and expand home sales.  And we are not greedy to ask that some of our tax money get used for some good to help people.  We give tax money constantly &#8211; why shouldn&#039;t some of it be given back in bad times?</p>
<p>There was a time when there wasn&#039;t any tax in America.  We gave when it was needed.  Let America help us now in our time of need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave - Portland, OR</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-19609</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave - Portland, OR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 03:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-19609</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll share my personal story... and hopefully it will help to illuminate the fact that there are plenty of people out there who are getting bitten by this crappy economy, not because of poor decisions, but simply in the name of trying to move forward with their lives.

I&#039;m the guy who should be moving up to a bigger, better home - but instead, I&#039;m bringing a huge check to the closing of my condo because I chose to accept a job offer that took me and my family from Chicago to the west coast.

Here&#039;s the deal.  My wife and I both put ourselves through college.  We met in college, and started our marriage off supporting each other through graduate school.  We both have good incomes and purchased a condo that was well within our means (mortgage is 1/4 of our monthly income as recommended by most financial gurus).

Here&#039;s the deal... A few months ago, I got a job offer from the most prestigious employer in my industry.  It was a job I had been gunning for for years... and it was 2000 miles away.

Condo to sell in the worst housing crisis since the depression.

New baby just turning 6 months

No job leads for my wife in this new location (fortunately she just got a good offer)

....I took it.

It was an insane decision, but living with the regret of turning down my dream gig would have been a far worse reality.

Needless to say, even though we put 10% down on our chicago condo back in 2006 - - - well, we bought at the peak and had to sell at the bottom.  We&#039;re closing in september for 20 percent less than what we bought our place for 3 years ago.

So here&#039;s the big slap in the face:  I play by the rules, I live within my means,  I take a new job in order to further my career and better my means, and I get screwed.

I didn&#039;t default on my mortgage and get to short sell it with the difference forgiven because of the economic climate.  NO - - I care about my credit.  I&#039;m showing up to the closing table with a huge check to write.

I&#039;m the seller who, if the economy was still somewhat decent, should be receiving money at the closing AND who should be buying up for my family.

Not my luck.  I&#039;m just a 31 year old guy, at a mid-level in my career, doing my best to get to the top  - - - and in the process of playing by all the rules and doing it all on my own - - - 

I&#039;m forced to eat some dirt.

I&#039;ll eat my loss, and move on with my life.  And I&#039;m sure the loss from this move will stop stinging with time and we might even laugh about it someday in the future... But for now I feel like I was duped by an American dream with a false bottom.  It&#039;s kind of sad when your dreams for success no longer mesh with what is supposed to be American ideals.  Hear that?  It&#039;s our forefathers rolling in their graves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ll share my personal story&#8230; and hopefully it will help to illuminate the fact that there are plenty of people out there who are getting bitten by this crappy economy, not because of poor decisions, but simply in the name of trying to move forward with their lives.</p>
<p>I&#039;m the guy who should be moving up to a bigger, better home &#8211; but instead, I&#039;m bringing a huge check to the closing of my condo because I chose to accept a job offer that took me and my family from Chicago to the west coast.</p>
<p>Here&#039;s the deal.  My wife and I both put ourselves through college.  We met in college, and started our marriage off supporting each other through graduate school.  We both have good incomes and purchased a condo that was well within our means (mortgage is 1/4 of our monthly income as recommended by most financial gurus).</p>
<p>Here&#039;s the deal&#8230; A few months ago, I got a job offer from the most prestigious employer in my industry.  It was a job I had been gunning for for years&#8230; and it was 2000 miles away.</p>
<p>Condo to sell in the worst housing crisis since the depression.</p>
<p>New baby just turning 6 months</p>
<p>No job leads for my wife in this new location (fortunately she just got a good offer)</p>
<p>&#8230;.I took it.</p>
<p>It was an insane decision, but living with the regret of turning down my dream gig would have been a far worse reality.</p>
<p>Needless to say, even though we put 10% down on our chicago condo back in 2006 &#8211; - &#8211; well, we bought at the peak and had to sell at the bottom.  We&#039;re closing in september for 20 percent less than what we bought our place for 3 years ago.</p>
<p>So here&#039;s the big slap in the face:  I play by the rules, I live within my means,  I take a new job in order to further my career and better my means, and I get screwed.</p>
<p>I didn&#039;t default on my mortgage and get to short sell it with the difference forgiven because of the economic climate.  NO &#8211; - I care about my credit.  I&#039;m showing up to the closing table with a huge check to write.</p>
<p>I&#039;m the seller who, if the economy was still somewhat decent, should be receiving money at the closing AND who should be buying up for my family.</p>
<p>Not my luck.  I&#039;m just a 31 year old guy, at a mid-level in my career, doing my best to get to the top  &#8211; - &#8211; and in the process of playing by all the rules and doing it all on my own &#8211; - &#8211; </p>
<p>I&#039;m forced to eat some dirt.</p>
<p>I&#039;ll eat my loss, and move on with my life.  And I&#039;m sure the loss from this move will stop stinging with time and we might even laugh about it someday in the future&#8230; But for now I feel like I was duped by an American dream with a false bottom.  It&#039;s kind of sad when your dreams for success no longer mesh with what is supposed to be American ideals.  Hear that?  It&#039;s our forefathers rolling in their graves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-19404</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-19404</guid>
		<description>Exactly! I don&#039;t think people are asking to be greedy and for handouts but I think they are asking for genuine help! When you require a down payment of 20% in most cases people just don&#039;t have that kind of money. The homes in my area are $150K and up for a decent single family home. So coming up with even 10% of that esepecially right now in this economy is almost impossible. Normally those who did work hard and paid thier bills could move up by selling thier current home and using the money to put down on another home. Today that is not possible! The homes we live in have no value at this time. There is no money to get out of it to put on another home. How are we suppose to move up? How are those homes suppose to get purchased? So your saying that only people who haven&#039;t bought before can buy now? Those who did things right and bought and paid their bills and worked hard can&#039;t get out because there is nobody buying thier home for the value of it. WE have lost money! We can&#039;t sell and move up!


So are we being greedy? I don&#039;t believe so! I think we have worked hard and 7 years or 10 years down the road things change, familes grow. If thigns in teh economy were on a normal path we could sell and uprade but we can&#039;t sell so how can we buy? Perhaps if we are assisted with a down payment then we can buy. The problem becomes the down payment! People don&#039;t have the money! If there is a credit that will allow down payment assistant then we can start buying, which in turn means people can start selling. Things can start moving. Those in apartments can move into starter homes those who have out grown those starter homes can move up to more apporiate homes for thier familes now.

I am sure it has a cost. It sucks that it does but everytrhing in life has a cost. If we can&#039;t move up and we can&#039;t buy how can we sell? If we cant buy or sell how does anythign change? Somethign has to change! People don&#039;t have extra money right now, many people are loosing thier jobs! Those who have money are afraid to use it because if they loose thier job thats all they have to live off of! So yeah I dont think it&#039;s being greedy I think it&#039;s called trying to survive!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly! I don&#039;t think people are asking to be greedy and for handouts but I think they are asking for genuine help! When you require a down payment of 20% in most cases people just don&#039;t have that kind of money. The homes in my area are $150K and up for a decent single family home. So coming up with even 10% of that esepecially right now in this economy is almost impossible. Normally those who did work hard and paid thier bills could move up by selling thier current home and using the money to put down on another home. Today that is not possible! The homes we live in have no value at this time. There is no money to get out of it to put on another home. How are we suppose to move up? How are those homes suppose to get purchased? So your saying that only people who haven&#039;t bought before can buy now? Those who did things right and bought and paid their bills and worked hard can&#039;t get out because there is nobody buying thier home for the value of it. WE have lost money! We can&#039;t sell and move up!</p>
<p>So are we being greedy? I don&#039;t believe so! I think we have worked hard and 7 years or 10 years down the road things change, familes grow. If thigns in teh economy were on a normal path we could sell and uprade but we can&#039;t sell so how can we buy? Perhaps if we are assisted with a down payment then we can buy. The problem becomes the down payment! People don&#039;t have the money! If there is a credit that will allow down payment assistant then we can start buying, which in turn means people can start selling. Things can start moving. Those in apartments can move into starter homes those who have out grown those starter homes can move up to more apporiate homes for thier familes now.</p>
<p>I am sure it has a cost. It sucks that it does but everytrhing in life has a cost. If we can&#039;t move up and we can&#039;t buy how can we sell? If we cant buy or sell how does anythign change? Somethign has to change! People don&#039;t have extra money right now, many people are loosing thier jobs! Those who have money are afraid to use it because if they loose thier job thats all they have to live off of! So yeah I dont think it&#039;s being greedy I think it&#039;s called trying to survive!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elaine,Easton,Pa.</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-18197</link>
		<dc:creator>Elaine,Easton,Pa.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 05:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-18197</guid>
		<description>We have some very wise people here. Just work hard, save your money, pay your bills, and buy your own home.  Well, that is exactly what we did.  My husband went in the Air Force at 17, to Viet-Nam, came home went to college on the GI-bill (sorry, I guess you would consider this welfare too), worked his way up from maintenance technician to Senior Engineer in his 38+ career.  Then Feb 2009 he was told he could take an early retirement or face a layoff.  He took the early retirement and got a few weeks extra pay and a year of insurance.  I  have been very ill for several years and in the hospital twice this year.  He was lucky he did.  Six weeks later they did lay offs.  We would very much like to sell our large home and downsize.  We&#039;ve never missed a payment &quot;YET&quot;.  We told our children they wouldn&#039;t have to take care of us the way we had to worry about their grandmother.  But, our pension fund has been reduced by almost 40%.  We don&#039;t have anymore years left to work hard again.  We have stock &quot;Ha&quot;.  Now I&#039;m not going to have insurance and have a pre-existing condition.  So yeah, I&#039;d like someone who could afford to buy our home to be able to get the tax credit so we could sell and move.  We don&#039;t need it!  
By the way my 52 year old brother just lost his long term job last week in Arkansas (so Ark. don&#039;t be cocky)and he owns his own home and has two children.  And my sister&#039;s son in south Texas is joining the service because there is no work there.  He usually works for his dad doing siding and replacement windows, but, there&#039;s no work.
And people from Texas and the Midwest talking about caps of $200,000 to $250,000.  That would not be fair to people in the northeast and California, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have some very wise people here. Just work hard, save your money, pay your bills, and buy your own home.  Well, that is exactly what we did.  My husband went in the Air Force at 17, to Viet-Nam, came home went to college on the GI-bill (sorry, I guess you would consider this welfare too), worked his way up from maintenance technician to Senior Engineer in his 38+ career.  Then Feb 2009 he was told he could take an early retirement or face a layoff.  He took the early retirement and got a few weeks extra pay and a year of insurance.  I  have been very ill for several years and in the hospital twice this year.  He was lucky he did.  Six weeks later they did lay offs.  We would very much like to sell our large home and downsize.  We&#039;ve never missed a payment &#034;YET&#034;.  We told our children they wouldn&#039;t have to take care of us the way we had to worry about their grandmother.  But, our pension fund has been reduced by almost 40%.  We don&#039;t have anymore years left to work hard again.  We have stock &#034;Ha&#034;.  Now I&#039;m not going to have insurance and have a pre-existing condition.  So yeah, I&#039;d like someone who could afford to buy our home to be able to get the tax credit so we could sell and move.  We don&#039;t need it!<br />
By the way my 52 year old brother just lost his long term job last week in Arkansas (so Ark. don&#039;t be cocky)and he owns his own home and has two children.  And my sister&#039;s son in south Texas is joining the service because there is no work there.  He usually works for his dad doing siding and replacement windows, but, there&#039;s no work.<br />
And people from Texas and the Midwest talking about caps of $200,000 to $250,000.  That would not be fair to people in the northeast and California, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim, Lisle, IL</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17927</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim, Lisle, IL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17927</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t it the &#039;80s that were referred to as the &quot;me decade&quot;? I think that the current level of blind self-interest has far surpassed the &#039;80s, at least among homeowners. Most of them seem to think that they deserve this $15000 gift from the government for producing absolutely nothing. Apparently none of them care about the effect this will have on the deficit, or how it will further erode the traditional American value of earning one&#039;s wealth. Maybe they should call this the &quot;greedy homeowner&#039;s decade&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#039;t it the &#039;80s that were referred to as the &#034;me decade&#034;? I think that the current level of blind self-interest has far surpassed the &#039;80s, at least among homeowners. Most of them seem to think that they deserve this $15000 gift from the government for producing absolutely nothing. Apparently none of them care about the effect this will have on the deficit, or how it will further erode the traditional American value of earning one&#039;s wealth. Maybe they should call this the &#034;greedy homeowner&#039;s decade&#034;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leeora-Fredericksburg, VA</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17769</link>
		<dc:creator>Leeora-Fredericksburg, VA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17769</guid>
		<description>I agree! I agree witht his idea of the new increased amount and opening it up to anytime home buyers. As long as it used as thier primary residence. It shouldn&#039;t be allowed to those who will just rent or try to make money off of it. 

I have paid all my bills and my mortgage faithfully for the last seven years I have owned my home. I have worked hard to do this. I bought a townhome before my husband and I were married. Were now married have two kids and two dogs. We are in desperate need of a single family home and a little bit larger home compared to a townhome. We nave no yard. No parking. No basement. NO garage. And again No yard. That&#039;s one of the biggest things when you have kids and dogs. They need room to play and run. 

We can&#039;t sell our home because of the market. We have lost so much money in equity. So before the homes were outrageously priced in our area and it was hard to get a home loan and move to a single family home because the cost was up so high. On the otherhand our townhome was worth anywhere from $230K-$250K. So event then you were cuaght in a catch 22 and it&#039;s the same for now. The home prices are low but we dont have the money to put down on a bigger home and we can&#039;t sell our current home. We also can&#039;t use equity or sale money to put down on our next home because again we can&#039;t sell our current home and even if we could we wouldn&#039;t make it any money because the prices are so low now.  Also with the first time home buyer I could qualify because I owned my townhome. My husband has never bought a home and is not on our current townhome. It&#039;s only in my name and as I said I bought it before we were even married 7 years ago. So we tried to see if maybe he could buy us a single family home and we could use the $8,000 tax credit. The problems we ran into were. First off you couldn&#039;t use the tax credit as a down payment and that&#039;s one of the biggest problems because people just don&#039;t have the extra money for that at this time. The other problem was even though he was an true first time home buyer he didn&#039;t qualify for the credit anyhow because he is married to me who owns a home. So were still stuck in our little townhouse. IT SUCKS!!!

We desperataly want out! We just want to get into a single family home that will work for all of and give our kids a yard to play in as well as our dogs. Our townhouse community doesn&#039;t even have a park or club hosue or anythign for the kids to even play. The only place they have to ride bikes or play is in the street and that&#039;s not safe! So I REALLY hope this bill gets passed because then my husband and I can both go into buying a bigger single family home like we really need now. If we have to sell and not make money then that&#039;s fine. It sure does suck because we have fought so hard to pay our bills and do things right the last 7 years and it feels like we get nothign out of that.

It does feel like those who have done the right things and work hard to do for themselves get screwed. Those that didn&#039;t pay thier bills regardless of why are the ones getting helped out. There are plenty of people who knowinly took on loans they couldn&#039;t afford or just didn&#039;t care to pay and they are the one&#039;s getting the help. Meanwhile you have people who were responsible took what they could afford and struggled to pay thier bills even in tough times and they get no help! It hardley seems fair. Plus we can&#039;t even sell our homes now and uprade if we want to because we have no money left in them. It&#039;s not right! We deserve a break too. I am not asking to get rich. I am asking to have the chance to own a home that my family needs. I have done things the right way and I have worked hard but I still can&#039;t move up. While those who didn&#039;t work hard or just let thier bills go are gettign the help. Does that seem fair?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree! I agree witht his idea of the new increased amount and opening it up to anytime home buyers. As long as it used as thier primary residence. It shouldn&#039;t be allowed to those who will just rent or try to make money off of it. </p>
<p>I have paid all my bills and my mortgage faithfully for the last seven years I have owned my home. I have worked hard to do this. I bought a townhome before my husband and I were married. Were now married have two kids and two dogs. We are in desperate need of a single family home and a little bit larger home compared to a townhome. We nave no yard. No parking. No basement. NO garage. And again No yard. That&#039;s one of the biggest things when you have kids and dogs. They need room to play and run. </p>
<p>We can&#039;t sell our home because of the market. We have lost so much money in equity. So before the homes were outrageously priced in our area and it was hard to get a home loan and move to a single family home because the cost was up so high. On the otherhand our townhome was worth anywhere from $230K-$250K. So event then you were cuaght in a catch 22 and it&#039;s the same for now. The home prices are low but we dont have the money to put down on a bigger home and we can&#039;t sell our current home. We also can&#039;t use equity or sale money to put down on our next home because again we can&#039;t sell our current home and even if we could we wouldn&#039;t make it any money because the prices are so low now.  Also with the first time home buyer I could qualify because I owned my townhome. My husband has never bought a home and is not on our current townhome. It&#039;s only in my name and as I said I bought it before we were even married 7 years ago. So we tried to see if maybe he could buy us a single family home and we could use the $8,000 tax credit. The problems we ran into were. First off you couldn&#039;t use the tax credit as a down payment and that&#039;s one of the biggest problems because people just don&#039;t have the extra money for that at this time. The other problem was even though he was an true first time home buyer he didn&#039;t qualify for the credit anyhow because he is married to me who owns a home. So were still stuck in our little townhouse. IT SUCKS!!!</p>
<p>We desperataly want out! We just want to get into a single family home that will work for all of and give our kids a yard to play in as well as our dogs. Our townhouse community doesn&#039;t even have a park or club hosue or anythign for the kids to even play. The only place they have to ride bikes or play is in the street and that&#039;s not safe! So I REALLY hope this bill gets passed because then my husband and I can both go into buying a bigger single family home like we really need now. If we have to sell and not make money then that&#039;s fine. It sure does suck because we have fought so hard to pay our bills and do things right the last 7 years and it feels like we get nothign out of that.</p>
<p>It does feel like those who have done the right things and work hard to do for themselves get screwed. Those that didn&#039;t pay thier bills regardless of why are the ones getting helped out. There are plenty of people who knowinly took on loans they couldn&#039;t afford or just didn&#039;t care to pay and they are the one&#039;s getting the help. Meanwhile you have people who were responsible took what they could afford and struggled to pay thier bills even in tough times and they get no help! It hardley seems fair. Plus we can&#039;t even sell our homes now and uprade if we want to because we have no money left in them. It&#039;s not right! We deserve a break too. I am not asking to get rich. I am asking to have the chance to own a home that my family needs. I have done things the right way and I have worked hard but I still can&#039;t move up. While those who didn&#039;t work hard or just let thier bills go are gettign the help. Does that seem fair?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis, Parkville, MD</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17385</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis, Parkville, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17385</guid>
		<description>To me the tax credit makes sense.  I work hard, I pay my taxes, I pay my bills, if anything I do doesn;t work; it fails and I move on to something newer and more creative. That&#039;s the way the market should work.  Why should we keep bailing out the people who screwed themselves and now can&#039;t or won;t pay their mortgages.  Why not help those who will actually stimulate the economy by spending their money and upgrading.  Unlike some of the other comments posted, just because you&#039;re upgrading doesn;t mean you are rich and can afford to upgrade anyway.  Some of us work hard at the things we have and for once, if I get to receive a benefit from the thousands of dollars I have paid over the years in taxes, then so be it.  Let me benefit and let me use the money I&#039;ve paid in taxes (in the form of a tax credit) to better myself and my family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me the tax credit makes sense.  I work hard, I pay my taxes, I pay my bills, if anything I do doesn;t work; it fails and I move on to something newer and more creative. That&#039;s the way the market should work.  Why should we keep bailing out the people who screwed themselves and now can&#039;t or won;t pay their mortgages.  Why not help those who will actually stimulate the economy by spending their money and upgrading.  Unlike some of the other comments posted, just because you&#039;re upgrading doesn;t mean you are rich and can afford to upgrade anyway.  Some of us work hard at the things we have and for once, if I get to receive a benefit from the thousands of dollars I have paid over the years in taxes, then so be it.  Let me benefit and let me use the money I&#039;ve paid in taxes (in the form of a tax credit) to better myself and my family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Sioux Falls, SD</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17367</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Sioux Falls, SD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17367</guid>
		<description>Based on everything I have read here, many really believe in free markets, and that the spending the government is doing is going to make us bankrupt.

Now for the truth, reverse fractional banking is the system we use that enable us to print as much money as we can without ever going broke. The taxpayer is not actually going to end up paying this bill, because every time we print money it is lent not given.

These bailouts are NOT GIFTS they never were. They were loans, and these companies are being pressured now to run tighter ships thanks to these large loans. The tax credits are really ways for government to focus stimulus into a slumping part of the economy in this case housing. Politicians know this but hope to gain political points for playing the game. 

Does anyone really know what truth is, or course not it’s up to you to judge and the status quo society we live in does a dang good job of making sure the majority will follow suit with the Jones and we create our own recessions, because we believe and then everybody reacts and the end result is a real problem everyone can see, feel, and enjoy because if everyone reacts then the real world result will change from good to bad.

Rumors of insolvency are the cause of recessions and depressions, and this form of self fulfilled prophesies is an amazing example of how others can control the world. Anyone can do it, cry wolf; then get enough people to believe in what you say and you control the world !!! With the internet it’s not that hard to do.

The system is designed to handle; via free market any amount of money they wish to print. They hope with scare tactics to get us all to believe otherwise. The goal is one world order and one world currency, which is great for us all because then we will never have another recession or depression again!!!  Stop watching the news, get some insurance coverage to protect your investments and live the way you were three years ago and everything will be just fine. The more BS you believe the more you will make it happen it’s elementary.

The market spends when it can, and does not when it can’t but everyone is not doing this at the same time and with new population everything sorts itself out just fine.

Here is some truth which is hard to swallow, the free markets are really giant money fields which when people plant their money and the super wealthy are ready to reap their harvest invest all kinds of crisis to cause an imaginary loss of money to flow from your pockets to theirs. If you look closely at all of the recessions you will see a massive increase in stock investing but the giant casino is designed like any other for the house to win. 

Now the question is who is the house? Poor people (fools) invest (plant their money) then the house with all of it’s forces (financial experts) has the job to get everyone to believe there is a problem so that they can reap the profits and start all over again almost every seven years. Rich get richer, and the poor get poorer it’s the American Way….

There is really no problem here, no recession or depression it&#039;s all a rumor and illusion. If again enough people believe or live in fear that we have a problem then by virtue of self fulfilled prophesy we do.

This tax credit will actually help a recovery, they have taken the money, now they are planting for the next harvest, GET IT???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on everything I have read here, many really believe in free markets, and that the spending the government is doing is going to make us bankrupt.</p>
<p>Now for the truth, reverse fractional banking is the system we use that enable us to print as much money as we can without ever going broke. The taxpayer is not actually going to end up paying this bill, because every time we print money it is lent not given.</p>
<p>These bailouts are NOT GIFTS they never were. They were loans, and these companies are being pressured now to run tighter ships thanks to these large loans. The tax credits are really ways for government to focus stimulus into a slumping part of the economy in this case housing. Politicians know this but hope to gain political points for playing the game. </p>
<p>Does anyone really know what truth is, or course not it’s up to you to judge and the status quo society we live in does a dang good job of making sure the majority will follow suit with the Jones and we create our own recessions, because we believe and then everybody reacts and the end result is a real problem everyone can see, feel, and enjoy because if everyone reacts then the real world result will change from good to bad.</p>
<p>Rumors of insolvency are the cause of recessions and depressions, and this form of self fulfilled prophesies is an amazing example of how others can control the world. Anyone can do it, cry wolf; then get enough people to believe in what you say and you control the world !!! With the internet it’s not that hard to do.</p>
<p>The system is designed to handle; via free market any amount of money they wish to print. They hope with scare tactics to get us all to believe otherwise. The goal is one world order and one world currency, which is great for us all because then we will never have another recession or depression again!!!  Stop watching the news, get some insurance coverage to protect your investments and live the way you were three years ago and everything will be just fine. The more BS you believe the more you will make it happen it’s elementary.</p>
<p>The market spends when it can, and does not when it can’t but everyone is not doing this at the same time and with new population everything sorts itself out just fine.</p>
<p>Here is some truth which is hard to swallow, the free markets are really giant money fields which when people plant their money and the super wealthy are ready to reap their harvest invest all kinds of crisis to cause an imaginary loss of money to flow from your pockets to theirs. If you look closely at all of the recessions you will see a massive increase in stock investing but the giant casino is designed like any other for the house to win. </p>
<p>Now the question is who is the house? Poor people (fools) invest (plant their money) then the house with all of it’s forces (financial experts) has the job to get everyone to believe there is a problem so that they can reap the profits and start all over again almost every seven years. Rich get richer, and the poor get poorer it’s the American Way….</p>
<p>There is really no problem here, no recession or depression it&#039;s all a rumor and illusion. If again enough people believe or live in fear that we have a problem then by virtue of self fulfilled prophesy we do.</p>
<p>This tax credit will actually help a recovery, they have taken the money, now they are planting for the next harvest, GET IT???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve from Boston MA</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17293</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve from Boston MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17293</guid>
		<description>How about we all just ignore all the babble from Washington, and Wall Street for that matter, and just do what&#039;s right for yourself and your family.
Working harder, and smarter, saving and investing wisely and avoiding debt - these never go out of fashion and will work during all economic cycles. 

Everyone&#039;s flipping out about how our government is giving away their tax money - well guess what&#039;s - there&#039;s nothing new there - they&#039;ve been giving it away since day one and always will. From land grants to the well-to-do that founded this country to land and mineral rights to the robber barons that owned railroads, to  tax breaks, etc to million and billionaires, our government has always taken from the middle class and  given to the rich ( and a few bones for the poor as well, just enough to keep them from starving or starting a revolution)

So forget the hype and the talking heads on the boob tube and just do the right thing for you and yours. Don&#039;t donate to politicians, don&#039;t pay bank fees, don&#039;t play the lottery, don&#039;t abuse credit cards, don&#039;t invest in crazy schemes or scam artists. Put your money in index funds, money market accounts and your local credit union. Live debt free and enjoy yourselves, you only go around once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about we all just ignore all the babble from Washington, and Wall Street for that matter, and just do what&#039;s right for yourself and your family.<br />
Working harder, and smarter, saving and investing wisely and avoiding debt &#8211; these never go out of fashion and will work during all economic cycles. </p>
<p>Everyone&#039;s flipping out about how our government is giving away their tax money &#8211; well guess what&#039;s &#8211; there&#039;s nothing new there &#8211; they&#039;ve been giving it away since day one and always will. From land grants to the well-to-do that founded this country to land and mineral rights to the robber barons that owned railroads, to  tax breaks, etc to million and billionaires, our government has always taken from the middle class and  given to the rich ( and a few bones for the poor as well, just enough to keep them from starving or starting a revolution)</p>
<p>So forget the hype and the talking heads on the boob tube and just do the right thing for you and yours. Don&#039;t donate to politicians, don&#039;t pay bank fees, don&#039;t play the lottery, don&#039;t abuse credit cards, don&#039;t invest in crazy schemes or scam artists. Put your money in index funds, money market accounts and your local credit union. Live debt free and enjoy yourselves, you only go around once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff, San Mateo, CA</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17292</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff, San Mateo, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17292</guid>
		<description>What we really appear to care about is &quot;home buying&quot; rather than &quot;home ownership&quot;.  If we really were concerned with true ownership, we&#039;d have programs designed to help people figure out how to pay off their mortgages. That has incredible long term benefits for all involved.

Any type of program that rewards one type of home purchase is unfair. We just bought a house but because I owned a condo (my wife had never owned) and earned too much due to the cost of living in CA, we are excluded from any incentive. We want to stop rewarding people for not saving enough money to actually buy a place as that only leads to problems later.  Had many people bought only what they could afford (we put down 40%), we wouldn&#039;t need bailouts today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we really appear to care about is &#034;home buying&#034; rather than &#034;home ownership&#034;.  If we really were concerned with true ownership, we&#039;d have programs designed to help people figure out how to pay off their mortgages. That has incredible long term benefits for all involved.</p>
<p>Any type of program that rewards one type of home purchase is unfair. We just bought a house but because I owned a condo (my wife had never owned) and earned too much due to the cost of living in CA, we are excluded from any incentive. We want to stop rewarding people for not saving enough money to actually buy a place as that only leads to problems later.  Had many people bought only what they could afford (we put down 40%), we wouldn&#039;t need bailouts today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William E, Tigard, Oregon</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17291</link>
		<dc:creator>William E, Tigard, Oregon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17291</guid>
		<description>Awesome! I will &quot;sell&quot; my house to my brother [$15K for him Ka-ching!], he will &quot;sell&quot; me his [$15K for me..ka-ching], then I will &quot;buy&quot; back my house from him [another $15K for me...ka-ching!] and he will &quot;buy&quot; back his house from me [another $15K for him...ka-ching].

At $30K per swap for each of us, we could repeat this every two weeks [to give time for recording and possession rules to play out], and cash out $30K*26 = $780,000 this year!

Pass this law...I really could use the million...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! I will &#034;sell&#034; my house to my brother [$15K for him Ka-ching!], he will &#034;sell&#034; me his [$15K for me..ka-ching], then I will &#034;buy&#034; back my house from him [another $15K for me...ka-ching!] and he will &#034;buy&#034; back his house from me [another $15K for him...ka-ching].</p>
<p>At $30K per swap for each of us, we could repeat this every two weeks [to give time for recording and possession rules to play out], and cash out $30K*26 = $780,000 this year!</p>
<p>Pass this law&#8230;I really could use the million&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally, Mission Viejo, CA</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17289</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally, Mission Viejo, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17289</guid>
		<description>We didn&#039;t get a tax credit when we bought my house 14 yrs ago, we had to do it the old-fashioned way....save! Why is it ok to give first time homebuyers a tax credit but not everyone? Saying that we&#039;re all &quot;well-off&quot; and can afford it anyways is extremely presumptuous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We didn&#039;t get a tax credit when we bought my house 14 yrs ago, we had to do it the old-fashioned way&#8230;.save! Why is it ok to give first time homebuyers a tax credit but not everyone? Saying that we&#039;re all &#034;well-off&#034; and can afford it anyways is extremely presumptuous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B, Kingsport, TN</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17286</link>
		<dc:creator>B, Kingsport, TN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17286</guid>
		<description>One more thing, I have seen comments asking how this tax credit is a subsidy.  The definition of subsidy from Webster:
&quot;a grant or gift of money&quot;; &quot; a grant by a government to a private person or company to assist an enterprise deemed advantageous to the public &quot;
Basically this credit is a gift to homebuyers which the government deems advantageous to the housing market.  How is it not a subsidy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing, I have seen comments asking how this tax credit is a subsidy.  The definition of subsidy from Webster:<br />
&#034;a grant or gift of money&#034;; &#034; a grant by a government to a private person or company to assist an enterprise deemed advantageous to the public &#034;<br />
Basically this credit is a gift to homebuyers which the government deems advantageous to the housing market.  How is it not a subsidy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Albuquerque, NM</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17285</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Albuquerque, NM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17285</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s OK to spend billions of taxpayers dollars to help GM, AIG, BoA and others but it&#039;s too expensive ($35 billion) which pails in comparison to the amount we spent on AIG alone.  When are we going to step up and help the tax payer?  This bill is worth supporting.  Rich people DO NOT need this tax break to buy a house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s OK to spend billions of taxpayers dollars to help GM, AIG, BoA and others but it&#039;s too expensive ($35 billion) which pails in comparison to the amount we spent on AIG alone.  When are we going to step up and help the tax payer?  This bill is worth supporting.  Rich people DO NOT need this tax break to buy a house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B, Kingsport, TN</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17284</link>
		<dc:creator>B, Kingsport, TN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:42:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17284</guid>
		<description>I would like to respond to an earlier comment from Tom in Marietta, GA stated &quot;So any tax credit proposed by a Republican is BAD. And anything that President Obama proposes that increases the Government’s size and power and decrease the state’s and individual rights is GOOD.

Do I understand that correctly?&quot;

It has nothing to do with whether this guy is Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Independent, or anything else...  This credit goes against the free market/capitalistic ideal which our economic system is based on.  Anybody who thinks the free market is the best way for an economy to run (which is one of the common themes of the Republicans) should think this credit is not a good idea.  Why?  Because it is a redistribution of the wealth...  Those who don&#039;t pay in $15K/year or more in taxes will get money from those people who pay in &gt;$15K/year.  Socialism at work.  Anti-republican &amp; anti-free-market thinking.  The republican senator who proposed this needs to rethink his political affiliations if he really thinks it is a good idea to rob Peter to pay Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to respond to an earlier comment from Tom in Marietta, GA stated &#034;So any tax credit proposed by a Republican is BAD. And anything that President Obama proposes that increases the Government’s size and power and decrease the state’s and individual rights is GOOD.</p>
<p>Do I understand that correctly?&#034;</p>
<p>It has nothing to do with whether this guy is Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Independent, or anything else&#8230;  This credit goes against the free market/capitalistic ideal which our economic system is based on.  Anybody who thinks the free market is the best way for an economy to run (which is one of the common themes of the Republicans) should think this credit is not a good idea.  Why?  Because it is a redistribution of the wealth&#8230;  Those who don&#039;t pay in $15K/year or more in taxes will get money from those people who pay in &gt;$15K/year.  Socialism at work.  Anti-republican &amp; anti-free-market thinking.  The republican senator who proposed this needs to rethink his political affiliations if he really thinks it is a good idea to rob Peter to pay Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B, Kingsport, TN</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17282</link>
		<dc:creator>B, Kingsport, TN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17282</guid>
		<description>What is the purpose of this credit?  To get houses moving or just to hand out money?  People have said that it is a great idea because they are getting their own money back to buy a house thus they think it is a tax cut.  A BIG problem with this thought:  If you don&#039;t pay in $15K per year in taxes, then you are getting somebody else&#039;s money.  As far as helping the housing market: if there aren&#039;t anymore people in the market who don&#039;t have homes to sell first, then we won&#039;t do anything to help the market.  People are saying this credit will allow them to upsize or downsize, but my guess is that most of them will have to sell their homes first.  I&#039;m sure these people will go looking for homes, which will give the impression of there being more buyers out there.  But until they sell their homes, if they see something they like, they&#039;ll have to put a contingency contract in place.  It could then turn into a vicious circle.  Everybody has homes under contract, but nobody can close the sale because the buyers all have to close on their homes first.  If everybody has to close first, then how does the circle get broken?  By somebody entering the market who doesn&#039;t have to sell a home first.  How does this happen?  By houses being affordable &amp; potential buyers having the impression that if they wait, it will cost them more money to buy a home.  I don&#039;t know about anybody else, but if I think that houses will continue to get cheaper, I will wait it out before I enter the market.  But, now that interest rates are going back up, I might decide to jump in so I don&#039;t have to pay more for the same home.  Rates going up might actually get the market moving more than anything else, because those who have been sitting on the sidelines will be afraid that it will cost more to buy a home if they wait much longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the purpose of this credit?  To get houses moving or just to hand out money?  People have said that it is a great idea because they are getting their own money back to buy a house thus they think it is a tax cut.  A BIG problem with this thought:  If you don&#039;t pay in $15K per year in taxes, then you are getting somebody else&#039;s money.  As far as helping the housing market: if there aren&#039;t anymore people in the market who don&#039;t have homes to sell first, then we won&#039;t do anything to help the market.  People are saying this credit will allow them to upsize or downsize, but my guess is that most of them will have to sell their homes first.  I&#039;m sure these people will go looking for homes, which will give the impression of there being more buyers out there.  But until they sell their homes, if they see something they like, they&#039;ll have to put a contingency contract in place.  It could then turn into a vicious circle.  Everybody has homes under contract, but nobody can close the sale because the buyers all have to close on their homes first.  If everybody has to close first, then how does the circle get broken?  By somebody entering the market who doesn&#039;t have to sell a home first.  How does this happen?  By houses being affordable &amp; potential buyers having the impression that if they wait, it will cost them more money to buy a home.  I don&#039;t know about anybody else, but if I think that houses will continue to get cheaper, I will wait it out before I enter the market.  But, now that interest rates are going back up, I might decide to jump in so I don&#039;t have to pay more for the same home.  Rates going up might actually get the market moving more than anything else, because those who have been sitting on the sidelines will be afraid that it will cost more to buy a home if they wait much longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe, St. Louis MO</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17280</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe, St. Louis MO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17280</guid>
		<description>We bought our home during the boom 5 years ago.  Homes were selling after a day or 2 on the market.  We had to move for job reasons, so I felt that we paid an inflated price.  With both of us having new jobs we were afraid to overextend ourselves so we bought a home in an area that was not our first choice.  Now we are doing well in our new jobs and would love to move to the areas that we really like and can afford the upgrade.  The problem is that our house is worth 10,000 to 20,000 less than we paid for it now that the bubble has burst.  We also have to cover the agent&#039;s commission for selling our home.  In order to have enough down payment on our next home we have to price our home higher than we probably should.  If we had this added boost we could drop the price 10,000 and probably sell our house easily.  Then the price would probably fall within the reach of the first time buyers that have been looking at our home but can&#039;t quite afford it.  So someone could get our house and we could upgrade.  I think this would help the economy a great deal.  I think there are a large number of 28-34 year old Americans like us that have good jobs and can help this economy.  I think it would work better than only trying to help 22-28 year old Americans that might not have been able to establish themselves in the workplace yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We bought our home during the boom 5 years ago.  Homes were selling after a day or 2 on the market.  We had to move for job reasons, so I felt that we paid an inflated price.  With both of us having new jobs we were afraid to overextend ourselves so we bought a home in an area that was not our first choice.  Now we are doing well in our new jobs and would love to move to the areas that we really like and can afford the upgrade.  The problem is that our house is worth 10,000 to 20,000 less than we paid for it now that the bubble has burst.  We also have to cover the agent&#039;s commission for selling our home.  In order to have enough down payment on our next home we have to price our home higher than we probably should.  If we had this added boost we could drop the price 10,000 and probably sell our house easily.  Then the price would probably fall within the reach of the first time buyers that have been looking at our home but can&#039;t quite afford it.  So someone could get our house and we could upgrade.  I think this would help the economy a great deal.  I think there are a large number of 28-34 year old Americans like us that have good jobs and can help this economy.  I think it would work better than only trying to help 22-28 year old Americans that might not have been able to establish themselves in the workplace yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William L. Poteat ,  Camarillo ,CA</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17268</link>
		<dc:creator>William L. Poteat ,  Camarillo ,CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17268</guid>
		<description>My Wife and I bought Two houses ten years and one of them is paid for.
We statred with $.32 in our pocket in 1961. We also have two other houses , one that we live in , in Camarillo , California and another in Fair Oaks , California which we rent .Most people try to &quot;live too high on the hog &quot; The other two houses are in South Lake Tahoe , California which we also rent out during the summer mostly .We pay cash for most items and live on a budget .We pay off our credit card (only one ) each month . I will be glad to tell any and all how we got to where we are financally .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Wife and I bought Two houses ten years and one of them is paid for.<br />
We statred with $.32 in our pocket in 1961. We also have two other houses , one that we live in , in Camarillo , California and another in Fair Oaks , California which we rent .Most people try to &#034;live too high on the hog &#034; The other two houses are in South Lake Tahoe , California which we also rent out during the summer mostly .We pay cash for most items and live on a budget .We pay off our credit card (only one ) each month . I will be glad to tell any and all how we got to where we are financally .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert, Urbana, Illinois</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17267</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert, Urbana, Illinois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17267</guid>
		<description>I am now a fundamentalist.  Fundamentally, a house is a place to live in.  If we are going to have the government assist people in buying houses, then it should stick to the basics and keep it about not having large sections of the population living outdoors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am now a fundamentalist.  Fundamentally, a house is a place to live in.  If we are going to have the government assist people in buying houses, then it should stick to the basics and keep it about not having large sections of the population living outdoors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill, Fayetteville, AR</title>
		<link>http://moremoney.blogs.money.cnn.com/2009/06/16/senator-wants-to-sweeten-home-buyer-tax-credit/#comment-17265</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill, Fayetteville, AR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyfeatures.blogs.money.cnn.com/?p=1280#comment-17265</guid>
		<description>p! U! Can you smell it? It&#039;s the smell of huge mounds of rotten government cheese! Jeepers, we should all help those who can&#039;t (through venues of our own choosing, and not so much so the government), but I am Da*n tired of the government telling me I have to help those who WON&#039;T. Get off your dead as* and work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p! U! Can you smell it? It&#039;s the smell of huge mounds of rotten government cheese! Jeepers, we should all help those who can&#039;t (through venues of our own choosing, and not so much so the government), but I am Da*n tired of the government telling me I have to help those who WON&#039;T. Get off your dead as* and work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
